Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
gfx gfx
76191 Posts in 13394 Topics by 2073 Members - Latest Member: caparuni February 20, 2020, 12:02:21 pm
WinMX World :: Forum  |  Third Party Stuff  |  Chat Clients  |  Post reply ( Re: 3.31 protocol supporting client )

Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Message icon:

Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What program is this site about?:
What year is it next year?:
What's the name of the site this forum belongs to?:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview

Topic Summary

Posted by: GhostShip
« on: August 23, 2010, 09:44:18 pm »

You claim to have added all of these things ritchy but we only have your word on that as you refuse to act with honour and show your sources to anyone even though you offered to do so on this very forum, I suggested a few programmers who are respected and you havent done as you claimed you would, doesnt that make you a liar ?

Btw its pretty easy to add most things when there is so much open src about and you dont have to show where you stole it from, thats usually the reason ppl hide their srcs.
Adding a plugin interface is also not very hard to do when there is the same interface in WCB and RoboMx that you can use as a template to learn from , please dont make out like its hard to do when you and I know different.

As I told you already 3 folks have made complaints about the ram usage on your new plugin ridden releases of modified WCS so please address your comments to them and not myself as frankly I dont care if you fix it or not just talking plainly and unlike yourself I dont have to go around trying to bully folks into agreeing with me, just look at how many folks this week are not running WCS compared to last week, stop being so lazy and asking me to do all your work.

Posted by: RebelMX
« on: August 23, 2010, 04:15:49 pm »

As you said on another thread Quicks
Quote from: GhostShip
either show some proof or stop saying it as its really not fair to make statements that are not supported with any proof
What parts need fixing?  With a top uptime of 159 days it seems to me to be stable and works >.>

And it's definately easier to make a plugin than a server... does it really take that much to figure that out... however as stated there is no Alias plugin since I didnt go on and make it.  The post about making it into a plugin is because it would actually work much better if you could call the actual entry/exit functions and make it show in the userlist (all very simply done in a plugin but impossible in metis).  However I soon decided that the "feature" was not one I personally wanted to develop to go go with RSWCS.

Quicks?  How do you "string edit" a sourcecode to add in a rich text gui?  Or plugin support in a server that never had it?  Or a whole host of other features and changes made that you put down to "string editing".  If it was done by just "string editing" then I really would be king since that pretty amazing.  Try asking Piney how little knowledge I have of programming when he has seen first hand sections of code and even my spontaneous assistance/fixing of portions of code.
Posted by: White Stripes
« on: August 23, 2010, 04:38:26 am »

must be easier to make a plugin than fix the server ;)
Posted by: reef
« on: August 23, 2010, 04:15:00 am »

perfect for some hallows eve lols :P

"Bad Ronald000_00000 has entered the room" ... ofc this is even better if the name doesnt show in the userlist...

Well not sure how many use it, but i know our room has had some good fun with it lol


Quote from: richy
However i'm gonna make this into a rswcs plugin

source here:

Pointless  But all of a sudden you want to make it into a plugin.  :crazy:

And just a side note: the script originally posted on the rebelion is a stripped down mod done by reactor
Posted by: GhostShip
« on: August 23, 2010, 01:38:25 am »

Your wasting your breath Stripes, the self styled chat room "string editing king"  knows better than any of us lol
 Better shut up myself of or he may develop the CHAT to a new plateau and make us all redundant  :lol: :lol:

When you get bored of editing strings and permissions ritchy what about making a program or something useful from scratch however firstly can I suggest fixing the new problem you have created with your "Kludged" (broken) WCS ?  Having had at least three complaints from folks its obviously something you need to address.

Posted by: White Stripes
« on: August 22, 2010, 10:47:07 pm »

Quote from: reef
I wrote a script awhile back called alias where a command is executed and a fake user "appears" to have entered the chat room.It was just for a bit of fun and a few laughs.

perfect for some hallows eve lols :P

"Bad Ronald000_00000 has entered the room" ... ofc this is even better if the name doesnt show in the userlist...

Quote from: skank
yes someone did suggest it and I claimed it pointless as it is a pointless script

dont have a funny bone in your entire body do you....
Posted by: Max™
« on: August 22, 2010, 07:01:32 pm »

Fair enough, stuff like that happens.
Hi Pri,
you are right, things do happen, sometimes its by another hand,
i found out a few years ago, 1 free hosing co. offered a pay for service as well,
when they decided to stop offering help to free forums, only willing to help pay for forums, i took up helping the free forums all i could,
they realised more people was seeking my help than paying to go pro, they deleted my forum for me, i stared again from scratch to where i am now.
Posted by: Pri
« on: August 22, 2010, 06:48:09 pm »

I'm sorry Pri we had a database issue and lost quite a bit of the forum.  Your post I assume was likely part of this loss, as we have attempted to put the site back together since.

Fair enough, stuff like that happens.
Posted by: RebelMX
« on: August 22, 2010, 06:37:19 pm »

I don't believe I've made, started, or released anything of this nature even.

But yes someone did suggest it and I claimed it pointless as it is a pointless script and I was more interested in creating a proper bot feature.  You will see soon enough. :)
Posted by: reef
« on: August 22, 2010, 05:20:22 pm »

I wrote a script awhile back called alias where a command is executed and a fake user "appears" to have entered the chat room.It was just for a bit of fun and a few laughs.Richy commented...

silly question but... i presume the user who "entered" will not appear on the userlist?
nice idea but not sure how "useful" it wld be :P

Now hes planning on making it into a plugin for the wcs version hes modifying. No doubt the whole concept will have been all his idea as well   ;)
Posted by: GhostShip
« on: August 22, 2010, 02:41:58 pm »

What programs has Ritchy written ? I hope he is not going to claim he wrote KM's work.

I was going to write up here just why creating a secondary client first was more efficient that creating a primary one first but to be honest I dont believe he cant figure that out I really feel he is pretending to be be stupid to waste my time.

I will be contacting KM this week to see if something can be done about Ritchys unlicenced WCS releases, I really dont have time to waste on this unruly child. 
Posted by: Bluey_412
« on: August 22, 2010, 02:11:04 pm »

Well, there ya go Stripes, it would be fair to take his Kludged program, fix it n make it all sweet, then call it your own, built from scratch, all yours
but you wouldnt do that would you? or would you?
I suppose what's good for the cat is good for the canary...
Posted by: White Stripes
« on: August 22, 2010, 01:00:35 pm »

that pride of yours is like screaming at a brick wall...
Posted by: RebelMX
« on: August 22, 2010, 12:13:09 pm »

Unfortunately you are way off the mark...

What "hacks" have I added?  I think your terminology should be a kludge?  Pick your words carefully :)

None of my metis scripts use any kind of kludge as they work exactly as they should.  My plugins again work just as they should, and RSWCS may well contain kludges, but they work well even if they aren't "beautiful" code.

A kludged program is still better than a broken/damaged/buggy one no matter what you try and pretend.
Posted by: White Stripes
« on: August 22, 2010, 11:27:23 am »

the plan is to have primary just that portion wont be open source... doesnt mean the binary doesnt have working primary...

and your 'fix and re-release' still doesnt cover not crediting the original author...

..whose to say you wont swipe code of a full winmx clone... rebrand it RSMX..  add a handfull of hacks... say you 'rewrote' it so its 'yours and yours alone' and not release any changes you make... i too far off the mark there richy? cos it seems thats your course of action everywhere else...
©2005-2020 All Rights Reserved.
SMF 2.0.17 | SMF © 2019, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.022 seconds with 20 queries.
Helios Multi © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!