gfxgfx
 
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
gfx gfx
gfx
76793 Posts in 13502 Topics by 1651 Members - Latest Member: Arnold99 November 15, 2024, 04:45:47 pm
*
gfx*gfx
gfx
WinMX World :: Forum  |  WinMX Help  |  Upload/Download Issues  |  secondary connection to a questionable primary
gfx
gfxgfx
 

Author Topic: secondary connection to a questionable primary  (Read 897 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

StrangeQuarkMatter

  • Guest
secondary connection to a questionable primary
« on: October 17, 2006, 05:43:09 am »
This question may be as dense as my name implies but are there any known dns names that should be avoided as primaries. I'm not 100% certain but if the evil empire's henchman are trying to disrupt the winmx network would it be possible to have a bogus primary appear to be a legitimate primary? So that anyone connecting to it would be on an isolated segment with vastly reduced search results.

I guess as part of my question is there any known instance of someone hacking the Primary Connection Advanced Settings -> Allocated Bandwidth, Search Thread Priority & Search Thread Duty Cycle, etc. to such an extent that anyone connected to them would experience useless search results?

KM

  • Guest
Re: secondary connection to a questionable primary
« Reply #1 on: October 17, 2006, 05:58:33 am »
the only problems with bad primaries are problems with primaries who are not patched, as connections to them tend to be... unreliable to say the least

however those primaries also tend to be full of flooders, so a lot of the time clients don't get sent there and you can avoid them most of the time (plus some of the caches check and refuse to send users to unpatched primaries)

is it possible for "them" to set up a primary (or a few) that does that? sure it is possible, is it worth doing? hell no, it would cost a lot in terms of resources, would be extremely easy to block if they did do it (just add them to the block lists) and would have no major effect as few users would be connected through them - plus of course officially they claim to only be attacking piracy so only do things that they can try to justify with that excuse (like attacking users who search for flooded terms - they use the excuse that it is a byproduct of disrupting piracy, or filling secondary slots to try and stop users being able to connect, they claim that as a byproduct of their flooding systems being too aggressive connecting rather than being deliberate)

Offline SamSeeSam

  • Forum Member
  • The Sky will never Fall on our heads
Re: secondary connection to a questionable primary
« Reply #2 on: October 17, 2006, 12:33:21 pm »
I don't think that has ever happened. A guy hacking and posing as a fake primary or something... I don't know anything furthur than that :) any technical details...  Mostly, sometimes, when you are connected to a slow primary(not necessairily an unpatched one), you get very slow results, etc. Best hit the refresh button and sort things out.

Cheers :P
Reconnect to winmx with the blocking patch :)
Patch link :
 https://patch.winmxconex.com/

Spread the word now :)

WinMX World :: Forum  |  WinMX Help  |  Upload/Download Issues  |  secondary connection to a questionable primary
 

With Quick-Reply you can write a post when viewing a topic without loading a new page. You can still use bulletin board code and smileys as you would in a normal post.

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name: Email:
Verification:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image
Type the letters shown in the picture:
What program is this site about?:
What year is it next year?:
What's the name of the site this forum belongs to?:

gfxgfx
gfx
©2005-2024 WinMXWorld.com. All Rights Reserved.
SMF 2.0.19 | SMF © 2021, Simple Machines | Terms and Policies
Page created in 0.008 seconds with 24 queries.
Helios Multi © Bloc
gfx
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!