I've been following this case closely, so far i haven't seen any actual evidence. A number of fairly poor witnesses, a hand full of worthless screen shots and some personal attacks on a defence witness. It seems the prosecution are taking the "oh comon judge we have loads of money they must be guilty" approach, i have seen little to suggest they have a valid case.
If the judge doesn't throw this out, he is clearly either a moron, or being "guided" down a path, lets hope the man stands firm and makes his judgment on the law not on any political pressure placed on him.