0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
As a former admin (especially as one of the founders) I feel I am entitled to clarification on the official policy of winmxworld regarding several matters.
1. the issue of censorship of things you disagree with, if someone says something you dislike, is it now official policy to hide, remove, or sidetrack such discussions (as has happened on several occasions)? please clarify if this is an official policy of lies and deceit (in a similar manner to the mxlie policy, although currently to a lesser scale)
2. the issue of winmxworlds insistence on trying to get together information on the network, now you are well aware (the most senior admins are definitely more than aware, others will have seen it mentioned and i should hope would be smart enough to have figured it out) that this information in the wrong hands is extremely harmful not only to the entire network, and to every single user on it, but also endangers every other user on the internet even if they have never heard of winmx before - now this dangerous information you have, it has been announced on several intentions you plan to release it to the public... care to try to justify this? and will you still be stubborn enough to deny a problem whilst your home connection is being hit with 400Mbit+ of attack traffic using the information you insisted on releasing?
3. why was winmxworld originally formed? why was it set up as a new help site when there were already other sites about? and do you really really think winmxworld is still what it was meant to be? the fact that one of the founding members was forced to leave over issues of what this place has turned in to lately makes this question pointless answering, however i ask it purely to make you think about it on the off chance you might decide to get rid of the vladd administration that currently runs the site and get some fucking admins who actually agree with what the site was meant to be (but somehow i doubt it's going to happen)
(or alternatively you can either just censor this post or simply do your usual tactic of refusing to answer the questions with some pointless "hey didn't you leave? so I'm going to pretend your questions aren't valid as an excuse to not answer them" bullshit - which i would accept as being an answer in itself)
(for the record, no, i have not had any alcohol at all to drink and he is merely trying to get users ignoring the foremost winmx expert purely because he knows full well that I speak the truth and can back up any claims with evidence if required, whereas anything he announces is only likely to ever be based on hearsay or guesses and he is apparently trying to get users to not even listen to anything I say in the hope they will listen to hearsay over fact - a policy very much like the mxlie policy which they use to try to get users to not listen to the problems mxlie are causing, and they even have half of their admins not believing in the flooder problem ffs)
So you admit that you are in fact fully aware of the issue and the damage, then do you wish to explain why you keep talking about how you want to figure out the actual implementation for it and release details to whoever wants it? is it because you intend to do that, or is it in fact bullshit in an attempt to lie to users about openness and shit (which this site has not been for a while - i used to be the only one actually giving out information anyone wanted and answering any technical questions users had, since i left every single question anyone has asked that any even semi-open site would answer has in fact got a refusal in response)
you mean his claims that he is well aware of the damage of the information he has been telling everyone he plans to give out? read the post i was replying to perhaps?or the repeated statements of an intention to release the source code for some patch they are trying to find someone to write? (although I'd expect that editing that would be a temporary thing, followed a couple of days later by some VB program with a text box and a "kill them" button) do you really want to claim you have never seen such statements on here about wanting such a patch made public?depending on which of those it was you wanted some "proof" for, as an admin, is it that you post replies without even bothering to read the thread first? or is it that you don't bother paying any attention at all to what is happening around you? or was it something else you were wanting proof of?