gfxgfx
 
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
gfx gfx
gfx
76793 Posts in 13502 Topics by 1651 Members - Latest Member: Arnold99 November 24, 2024, 05:56:36 am
*
gfx*gfx
gfx
WinMX World :: Forum  |  Discussion  |  WinMx World News  |  Uk Events
gfx
gfxgfx
 

Author Topic: Uk Events  (Read 11591 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline GhostShip

  • Ret. WinMX Special Forces
  • WMW Team
  • *****
Uk Events
« on: May 17, 2005, 04:19:52 am »
Hmm this one is a bit closer for me, but as we are paying all sorts of stealth levies and taxes should we really be suprised ?

http://www.macworld.co.uk/news/index.cfm?home&NewsID=11587

Quote
Members of the UK music business are said to have given support to an iPod tax – a copyright levy that would be added to the price of every MP3 player sold, based on the assumption that some music on the device has not been paid for.
Some criticise the move, suggesting that this means music purchased legally is being bought twice. There is also a suggestion that by adding the tax to MP3 players, the music industry would be monetizing P2P trading and legitimizing the piracy.


Paid for twice again , lol  
This sounds like the recording industrys way of doing business for the last 5 years  :lol:

Offline GhostShip

  • Ret. WinMX Special Forces
  • WMW Team
  • *****
Uk Events
« Reply #1 on: May 20, 2005, 11:37:26 am »
Seems that we the taxpayers are picking up the tab for legal proceedings, in what are effectively civil matters  :evil:

http://insight.zdnet.co.uk/business/legal/0,39020487,39198084,00.htm

Quote
The conviction of four self-proclaimed Robin Hoods for conspiracy to defraud last week has raised some serious questions over just how much public resource should be diverted into helping software companies protect their wares when they don't use all the security technology currently designed for just this purpose.


Hmm i,m sure that the guys where guilty of something but why should the aggreived companies not take up the cost as you or I would have to do in similar circumstances ?
Seven million pounds is a lot of effort to try folks 4 folks that where part of a gang that only lost the software vendors £32 million worldwide
(and thats at the products full market prices, if purchased as educational version the cost would have been about the costs of the case  :roll:  )

KM

  • Guest
Uk Events
« Reply #2 on: May 20, 2005, 12:02:59 pm »
didn't you know? If you are poor, you have to pay for any costs you may have for anything, if you are rich then its deemed that the government should pay because you cant afford to...

Offline GhostShip

  • Ret. WinMX Special Forces
  • WMW Team
  • *****
Friends In High Places ?
« Reply #3 on: June 06, 2005, 03:26:21 am »
Another round of Billions for those who have had their share already it seems  :x

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,176-1641428,00.html

Quote
Britains super-rich rock veterans are about to get even richer. The government wants to extend copyright laws to ensure pop songs are protected for almost twice as long as the current 50 years.


This headline makes it seem as though the artist will profit from this , that is not really the case as we have seen recently, they may if they are lucky get 10%, the bulk of this goes to the big overseas recording industries.

This is obscene greed and unfair to ordinary people, the law is clear on this point , they have had their share and the music should be available to the public for free when the time has elapsed.

Ministers should not fall into the trap of letting greed and scare tactics rob the majority of the populace who abide by the law to suit a few friends in the "industry"

I think this sets a bad example for the UK, to try to steal something that has a limited time span on it and extend that, to profit the Cartel of theives is a serious and criminal act in itself

KM

  • Guest
Uk Events
« Reply #4 on: June 06, 2005, 10:43:20 am »
10% is what they would be expecting to get - in reality they never do, they get given a fixed fee and after that all of it goes to "them" - they get most of their money through concerts and other things that they have to be paid for, theys why they go on tour, not to promote albums etc, but to make money

Offline GhostShip

  • Ret. WinMX Special Forces
  • WMW Team
  • *****
Uk Events
« Reply #5 on: June 20, 2005, 02:24:31 pm »
This looked interesting and I set down to read the figures with some interest...

http://www.digital-lifestyles.info/display_page.asp?section=business&id=2325

Quote
According to a survey by Entertainment Media Research, UK legal digital music downloads have grown by a thumping great 75% in a year.


Hmm so they are not having the millions of pounds of lost revenue they kept bombarding the media with ?
Thats the thing with lying it catches up with you ...if we can believe the survey.

I was Hopeing to bring you a decent breakdown and analysis of the figures but, suprise suprise you cant see them, so in fact the survey results are worthless, as we are only going to see results that suit their customer ... wonder who that is ? (answers on a postcard )

I hope this means that as everyone is legally downloading now, they can stop with the pretence of sueing their customers to stop losses...thats if they believe their own propaganda, lets see shall we  :twisted:

Offline GhostShip

  • Ret. WinMX Special Forces
  • WMW Team
  • *****
A Joke
« Reply #6 on: June 22, 2005, 04:20:54 pm »
I read this story with disbelief, it has so many factual inaccuracies, I hardly though it worth posting..

http://www.thisisgloucestershire.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=139571&command=displayContent&sourceNode=139301&contentPK=12669356

Quote
Sylvia Price could go to jail or be fined £4,000 after her daughter downloaded music from the internet. The 53-year-old couldn't believe it when she came home from work to find a summons from a London solicitors.
Wiggins Solicitors, who prosecute internet pirates on behalf of record companies, say Mrs Price's daughter Emily, 14, has been breaking the law for two years.


For non UK folks,  a summons is issued by a civil court and is a claim for compensation, not a real life loss figure.

Also the whole thing is worthless as the mother is not  responsible for her daughters action and as this was not a criminal offence they can take no action against her daughter until she is 18.

A summons can be dismissed if it has the wrong name on it and the company agrees that it was the daughter who did the up/downloading, so there is in fact no case for the mother to answer.  

What I wish to know is how did they know that this had been happeneing for two years and why wait so long to take action ?
Furthermore, if they obtained any details from the ISP as regards the daughter or mothers identity they should also have informed them of their rights under the data protection act as regards to storing personal information and what information is held, often a trawl through this will reveal useful information that the logging company would wish not made public, along with the fact that a computer printout is not evidence unless backed up by a live witness who has to go to court if ordered to do so..

Quote
Emily says she didn't know that the file-sharing program she used was wrong.


Err Emily wake up , its not , swapping stuff you dont own the copyright to is what they are complaining about.

Lets call this what it is, legalised extortion and propaganda to scare law abiding users.

KM

  • Guest
Uk Events
« Reply #7 on: June 23, 2005, 12:36:49 pm »
This is a legal matter now, breeches of the data protection act are a criminal offence and both the ISP and "they" can be prosecuted for it and the government has a legal obligation to press charges... if you would like to bet that these illegal acts are ignored, i'm not going to take your money - because you're certain to win the bet

Offline GhostShip

  • Ret. WinMX Special Forces
  • WMW Team
  • *****
Uk Events
« Reply #8 on: July 23, 2005, 12:21:15 pm »
I have read this small article and really the guy was putiing his business in between a hard rock and an immovable object.

http://comment.silicon.com/0,39024711,10002682,00.htm

Quote
Charlotte McConnell, a solicitor at law firm Bristows, said: "It seems that with music piracy, the courts both in the UK and the US are keen to find a commercial entity to blame. In this case the primary infringers are the individuals downloading the music. But individuals are difficult to catch."
After all, EasyInternetCafé was offering a perfectly legitimate service - it was the customers who transgressed.



Much as I feel sorry for the business holder he should have taken steps to ensure folks could burn their data in private, once his staff got involved in the act of making a disk, they could have seen it was not on the right side of the law and refused.

Offline GhostShip

  • Ret. WinMX Special Forces
  • WMW Team
  • *****
Uk Events
« Reply #9 on: July 23, 2005, 12:27:32 pm »
While I was reading the above story I also noticed this one.

http://management.silicon.com/government/0,39024677,39150672,00.htm

Quote
A UK man has been fined £500 and sentenced to 12 months' conditional discharge for hijacking a wireless broadband connection.

On Wednesday, a jury at Islewoth court in London found Gregory Straszkiewicz, 24, guilty of dishonestly obtaining an electronic communications service and possessing equipment for fraudulent use of a communications service.
Straszkiewicz was prosecuted under sections 125 and 126 of the Communications Act 2003.


This is something to be aware of folks as if your security is weak the technically inclined may well take advantage of your laxity.

On the other hand, I,m sure this would be a great reason for not paying any extortion money to the Cartel , as the law clearly states they must prove who was operating the machine at the time of their logging operations, not merely who is the subscriber.

Offline GhostShip

  • Ret. WinMX Special Forces
  • WMW Team
  • *****
Uk Events
« Reply #10 on: August 02, 2005, 06:47:10 am »
Another cash generating scheme for the Cartels  :roll:

http://www.netimperative.com/2005/08/01/3_EMI

Quote
Mobile network operator 3 has partnered with record label EMI Music UK to offer customers full-length music tracks to download on their mobiles.
The deal builds on 3’s existing music services, which includes full-length videos from Sony BMG and music videos from independent label artists through VidZone.

The agreement will also give customers access to EMI Music’s labels, which include EMI Records, Parlophone, Relentless and Virgin, along with back catalogue material.  
 
The tracks will be available in either WMA or AAC format, depending on the handset.  Tracks will cost £1.50 each.


Oh dear another rip off, its nice that they are opening the back catalogues but £1.50 for a DRM infested track is a joke, I suspect most folks would rather get a better deal from here

http://www.allofmp3.com/

I havent seen anyone beat them on price yet  :wink:
and this seemed very interesting
Quote
You will not be charged for previewing tracks

If only the industry got around to thinking big rather than high price/low distribution.

Offline GhostShip

  • Ret. WinMX Special Forces
  • WMW Team
  • *****
Uk Events
« Reply #11 on: August 04, 2005, 06:32:25 pm »
This is not really related to file sharing just illegal bootlegging that goes on, but the industry like to lump them in with file sharing to make it sound as though filesharers are sources of revenue for criminal activities, so be aware folks that when you read any item of news like this thats the difference.

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/tm_objectid=15816988%26method=full%26siteid=89488%26headline=dvd%2dp%2dpirates%2dsunk%2d-name_page.html

Quote
SCOTLAND'S biggest pirate DVD and CD racket was sunk in a series of co-ordinated raids yesterday.
Computer gear capable of churning out millions of pounds worth of counterfeit discs was seized.

In a TV interview in February last year, Reid boasted that he would not be stopped and 'could not care less' if he was arrested.
Reid has been raided before and had thousands of CDs seized. Most of his dodgy discs were sold to students at nearby Glasgow University.

BPI investigator Pat Ferguson helped co-ordinate yesterday's operation. He said: 'People can claim all the benefits under the sun and make a lot of money on the side.
'If you think a CD costs £11 in the shops and these bootleg master CDs hold 60 albums each, that's a loss to the music industry of £660 a pop.


Well this looks like a simple couterfeiting case although one thing worries me..
The BPI investigator seems unable to tell the difference betweeen a CD and a DVD :shock:   I challenge anyone to fit 60 albums on a CD  :lol:

KM

  • Guest
Uk Events
« Reply #12 on: August 04, 2005, 07:01:52 pm »
i wonder where they are paying £660 to every time he produces a CD, they say its a loss therefore they must be losing that money or they would be guilty of deception... so where the hell does that money go?

Offline GhostShip

  • Ret. WinMX Special Forces
  • WMW Team
  • *****
Uk Events
« Reply #13 on: August 12, 2005, 04:47:08 pm »
Not sure what tosay about this one  :P  

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/music/4135830.stm

Quote
HMV stores to give download help  
 
Retailer HMV will teach customers how to download music, to try to persuade a wider range of people to download as it enters the digital music market.
The high street chain will install computers in 200 stores and launch its own download service in September.
HMV said it aimed to "demystify" downloading for "women, older people and music fans in general".
Earlier this year the British Phonographic Industry (BPI) estimated that 96% of downloaders were male.


Err good on ya HMV, make sure you tell the ones using WinMX to set their routers up ok   :lol:

Offline GhostShip

  • Ret. WinMX Special Forces
  • WMW Team
  • *****
Uk Events
« Reply #14 on: August 27, 2005, 01:34:02 pm »
At last an honest vendor of programs  :shock:
The BBC are thinking of allowing programming content on the internet,the corporation is wholly publicly owned and therefore the content has already been paid for by the UK public so this should be interesting.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/tv_and_radio/4187036.stm

Quote
A simulcast of BBC One or BBC Two, letting UK viewers see programmes on the web at the same time as they go out on TV, is being planned.
Proposals to make clips available on mobile phones are also being speeded up, director of TV Jana Bennett said.

A player to let viewers watch shows on the internet for a week after they have been broadcast on TV is in development.
In an interview with the Guardian newspaper, Ms Bennett said she hoped to simulcast a channel within the next year.
'Wake-up call'
"It's a great way of getting public service content, which people have already paid for, out to people in a different way," she said.


I hope this goes through, its a lightyear ahead of any other countries schemes to place content online.

KM

  • Guest
Uk Events
« Reply #15 on: August 27, 2005, 02:45:22 pm »
the BBC have been promising that for ages, so far they have implimented part of their plan to let you download some programmes, but mainly the news channels where you can download the headlines as well as all the major daily news broadcasts

long live the BBC!

although if the internet replaced TV, then people wont need a TV, so wont pay their TV licence, so the BBC will run out of funds... hmm, sort of stabbing themselves in the foot there? lol

Offline GhostShip

  • Ret. WinMX Special Forces
  • WMW Team
  • *****
Uk Events
« Reply #16 on: August 27, 2005, 06:10:24 pm »
I,m sure the goverment would just implement a net tax or make all programs pay per view  :?

Offline GhostShip

  • Ret. WinMX Special Forces
  • WMW Team
  • *****
Tiscali To Limit Usage At Peak Times
« Reply #17 on: September 04, 2005, 06:22:27 pm »
Another interesting development

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/09/02/tiscali_fup/

Quote
Tiscali UK is cracking down on broadband users who hammer the service at peak times. Its "three strikes and you're out" policy means that bandwidth hogs will receive three warnings if they are found to be abusing the service.
If punters fail to moderate their usage, then the ISP plans to restrict their usage during peak hours "for the good of all other customers".


Well I suppose this is fair for customers on the lower paying packages, not sure how it fits in with the services they are offering though.  :?

Offline GhostShip

  • Ret. WinMX Special Forces
  • WMW Team
  • *****
Uk Events
« Reply #18 on: October 06, 2005, 04:33:56 am »
This is of concern for UK citizens

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/10/05/ncc_euro_copyright_law/

Quote
The National Consumer Council (NCC) has called on European Commission legislators to take a fairer stance on consumer intellectual property rights.

The NCC believes it's disproportionate to invoke ever-tougher penalties for individuals found guilty of infringing intellectual property laws. The key word is 'individuals', because the NCC sees a clear difference between consumers copying content and "organised criminal gangs" doing the same.

 There is a difference - the latter are motivated solely by financial gain while consumers generally aren't. At the same time, because technology has made it so easy for consumer to duplicate content, the effect on copyright holders is increasingly the same whoever does the copying.

"The European Commission must think again before bringing in new and tougher intellectual property laws," said the NCC's policy director Jill Johnstone. "Criminal sanctions for infringing copyright holders' rights must be applied only to organised crime - not to individual citizens making use of new technologies."

"Moves are afoot in Brussels to tighten up enforcement of intellectual property laws," she added. "It could mean consumers facing criminal sanctions and a criminal record for sharing creative content."


Another case of the recording industry crying wolf to a few paid off politicians who then try to saddle the burden of prosecuting folks on the public purse.

Offline GhostShip

  • Ret. WinMX Special Forces
  • WMW Team
  • *****
Uk Events
« Reply #19 on: October 06, 2005, 04:41:12 am »
We can thank a few folks here for watching out for our interestss if the governent will not.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/10/05/fipr_ip_offense/

Quote
The British government is trying to use its presidency of the EU to push through a European directive would give police more powers to act against copyright infringers than they currently have to deal with suspected terrorists, according to the Foundation for Information Policy Research (FIPR).

The FIPR also warns that the directive, a follow up to the Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement directive, would force the UK to criminalise patent infringement, and incitement to infringe copyrights or patents.
If patent infringement becomes a crime, the FIPR argues, the risks involved in launching a technology start-up will be even greater than they are today. It warns that promising businesses will choose to set up in the US instead, where patent infringement will remain a civil matter.

Ross Anderson, chair of FIPR and professor of security engineering at Cambridge University said that despite government promises to "foster the creative industries", this directive will have exactly the opposite effect.
"It will interfere with enterprise and choke off competition. It will push up prices for consumers at a time of rising global inflation, and do particular harm to the software and communications industries," he says. "It will also harm universities, libraries and the disabled


Cheers guys for the info  8)

Unfortunately none of this back door dealing suprises me any longer as it seems even the better members of parliment are willing to sell out the rest of us for the price of a "consultancy" fee.

WinMX World :: Forum  |  Discussion  |  WinMx World News  |  Uk Events
 

gfxgfx
gfx
©2005-2024 WinMXWorld.com. All Rights Reserved.
SMF 2.0.19 | SMF © 2021, Simple Machines | Terms and Policies
Page created in 0.009 seconds with 22 queries.
Helios Multi © Bloc
gfx
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!