gfxgfx
 
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
gfx gfx
gfx
76620 Posts in 13450 Topics by 2077 Members - Latest Member: Kitkat May 13, 2021, 10:57:53 pm
*
gfx*gfx
gfx
WinMX World :: Forum  |  Discussion  |  WinMx World News  |  AFACT Wants Aussie Govt to Force ISPs to Fight P2P
gfx
gfxgfx
 

Author Topic: AFACT Wants Aussie Govt to Force ISPs to Fight P2P  (Read 485 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DaBees-Knees

  • WMW Team
  • *****
AFACT Wants Aussie Govt to Force ISPs to Fight P2P
« on: April 24, 2010, 08:48:25 pm »
http://www.zeropaid.com/news/88701/afact-wants-aussie-govt-to-force-isps-to-fight-p2p/

Quote
Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft’s executive director, Adrianne Pecotic, says that ISPs refuse to create a voluntary code to deal with copyright infringement on their networks, and that unless the govt follows the lead of countries like the UK and France where the govt forced one upon them, the country’s digital economy is at risk.

Adrianne Pecotic, the executive director of the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft, is asking the Australian govt to force ISPs to deal with copyright infringement on their networks, especially in light of its court loss to iiNet, where a judge ruled the ISP was not liable for customers using BitTorrent to illegally share copyrighted material on its network.

“I find the mere provision of access to the Internet is not the means of infringement,” said the judge in his ruling. “iiNet has no control over the BitTorrent system and is not responsible for the operation of the BitTorrent system,” he added.

The govt urged AFACT and ISPs to voluntarily devise a code of conduct for dealing with copyright infringement, but according to the Australian IT, AFACT complains that ISPs are “refusing to negotiate,” a charge which iiNet strongly denies.

“The internet industry and copyright holders had been in detailed discussions for a number of years, before AFACT and its Executive Director, Ms Pecotic, called off negotiations in August 2007 to commence their unsuccessful legal proceedings against iiNet in the Federal Court,” it says in a statement. “Clearly, AFACT are not part of the solution, instead appear only to hinder the process of developing mutually beneficial business relationships. Prior to the Federal Court hearing, iiNet again sought to negotiate with AFACT on these matters, but they refused.”

AFACT may insist that iiNet is to blame, but something tells me copyright holders are at fault here. Why? Because they’ve watched from the sidelines as their counterparts in countries like South Korea, France, the UK, and New Zealand successfully guide through legislation forcing ISPs to deal with copyright infringement, often at a greater degree than any voluntary code could ever hope to reproduce.

In South Korea, France, and the UK the govt requires, or will require in the case of the UK, ISPs to disconnect users who fail to heed a third warning for copyright infringement ala “three-strikes,” and AFACT longs for a similar system to be instituted in Australia as well.

“AFACT believes that Australia should not be left behind the rest of the world and that our legal framework must address the growing issue of online copyright theft,” added Pecotic. “The current state of the law as a result of the iiNet decision is a threat to our digital economy.”

So there it is. AFACT doesn’t seem interested in creating a voluntary code with ISPs because it knows it will never come close to delivering the kind of crackdown on copyright infringement that it wants to see take place.

AFACT’s appeal of the iiNet decision kicks off today when a timetable will be set for the trial in Federal Court.

“I find the mere provision of access to the Internet is not the means of infringement,”

It's nice to see someone question the so called logic of the music industries case.  8)

Offline Savage Blades

  • Forum Member
    • DJ Hire
Re: AFACT Wants Aussie Govt to Force ISPs to Fight P2P
« Reply #1 on: April 25, 2010, 07:55:54 am »
Indeed.
it would be like holding 'gun shops' liable to those who do something illegal with the firearms after they purchase them...

I know a DJ in Australia, that since 'Record Companies" there,
stopped releasing CD Singles in their stores is now "Forced" to get online to get upto date music..
My opinions, are mine !
They may, or may not reflect the views and opinions of other WinMX World Forum members !!
DJ Hire

Re: AFACT Wants Aussie Govt to Force ISPs to Fight P2P
« Reply #2 on: April 25, 2010, 09:40:00 am »
I cant wait till this gets through, then it will set a precedent and we can finally force the department of transport to take responsibility for allowing all those criminals access to the scene of every crime.

Offline GhostShip

  • Ret. WinMX Special Forces
  • WMW Team
  • *****
Re: AFACT Wants Aussie Govt to Force ISPs to Fight P2P
« Reply #3 on: April 25, 2010, 10:18:47 am »
A usual we see the story in more clear terms if we reword some of the report :

Vested interest commercial group want monopoly powers to ensure they continue to dominate global music production and force artists to sign away their rights to the Cartel in exchange for having good access to the consumer that the grant of such monopoly brings, thus they will do anything and say anything to obtain such powers.

WinMX World :: Forum  |  Discussion  |  WinMx World News  |  AFACT Wants Aussie Govt to Force ISPs to Fight P2P
 

gfxgfx
gfx
©2005-2021 WinMXWorld.com. All Rights Reserved.
SMF 2.0.18 | SMF © 2021, Simple Machines | Terms and Policies
Page created in 0.031 seconds with 22 queries.
Helios Multi © Bloc
gfx
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!