Author Topic: New Client (Read 120816 times)

MinersLantern · « **Reply #140 on:** May 14, 2014, 06:10:50 am »

Who is this Fuller person?
A 13 year old? It sure looks like it!

silicon_toad2000 · « **Reply #141 on:** May 14, 2014, 07:01:07 am »

Fuller/Ants/Joanne is just a troll and will keep coming back each time we talk about it, honestly not worth the effort.
If it gets too bad we can ban them but not worth the effort, ignore them and they'll go away.

~~FULLER~~ · « **Reply #142 on:** May 15, 2014, 08:31:52 pm »

You sychophants can all suck as much as you like but winmx
is dead.

Chat rooms are shutting almost daily and as much as you have
tried, it has taken way too long and users have moved on.

~~FULLER~~ · « **Reply #143 on:** May 15, 2014, 08:33:52 pm »

I should also add, just look back at the false promises on here
the go back YEARS

GhostShip · « **Reply #144 on:** May 15, 2014, 10:41:48 pm »

Perhaps you would be happy to show them to me

silicon_toad2000 · « **Reply #145 on:** May 15, 2014, 11:15:02 pm »

Fuller has been banned

for those who care what fuller has to say, just scroll back, it's all the same.

GhostShip · « **Reply #146 on:** May 15, 2014, 11:34:24 pm »

I wont be complaining that the naysayer is no longer welcome, you makes your bed and you get to lie in it..

MSmithy · « **Reply #147 on:** May 18, 2014, 11:38:33 am »

Maybe I missed it somewhere but, is there an ETA on the next build of the new client to fix the bugs?

wonderer · « **Reply #148 on:** May 18, 2014, 11:47:11 am »

ETA somewhere in future
the more patient you are the sooner it will be

silicon_toad2000 · « **Reply #149 on:** May 18, 2014, 01:32:38 pm »

No, no ETA at this stage

MACROFAN · « **Reply #150 on:** May 18, 2014, 05:19:41 pm »

Quote from: MSmithy on May 18, 2014, 11:38:33 am

Maybe I missed it somewhere but, is there an ETA on the next build of the new client to fix the bugs?

Just ask which millenium, this lot are a bunch of jokers
just scroll back through 3 YEARS and see the false promises.

Winmx is finished and this new client is YEARS away from even beta.

The answer here is ban anyone that challenges the JOKERS.

THIS LOT ARE A BUNCH OF JOKERS WHO KID THEMSELVES.

Bluehaze · « **Reply #151 on:** May 18, 2014, 05:39:43 pm »

Macrofan, why do you fear this project? There is no harm in it to you. Why do you keep hanging around "jokers" (your words) and contending with them? Are you a "joker" joker?

GhostShip · « **Reply #152 on:** May 18, 2014, 09:30:56 pm »

This is the same troll who needed me to remind them that beta 1 was on the front page of the site, hardly a broken promise.

As we all know naughty children are apt to be impatient, squeal a lot and stamp their little feet when their toys are not about to be smashed into a wall or hit with a hammer, I'm really sorry your folks didnt spend more time with you.

wonderer · « **Reply #153 on:** May 20, 2014, 10:07:15 am »

There can't be no ETA as that would say there will NOT be a new release and there will be one for sure
The confusion here lays in the ETA which is now used as Expected Time of Arrival but origins as Estimated Time of Arrival which is a huge difference.
I will persist in
ETA somewhere in future
the more patient you are the sooner it will be.
The more eager you are the longer it seems to take
Be patient and suddenly it will be there, sooner then expected

White Stripes · « **Reply #154 on:** May 20, 2014, 10:48:05 am »

http://www.acronymfinder.com/ETA.html

there are many meanings for ETA.... see for yourself....

a curious question for the devs... and i know this one will be waaaaay later down the road... but is a native 64bit version on the drawing board?

GhostShip · « **Reply #155 on:** May 20, 2014, 11:10:32 am »

I don't see any issue with having a 64 bit in the future as whilst there are some variables that need tweaking to ensure they wont deliver the wrong value most of the modern development suites offer such functionality as standard and our main developer always has the most up to date VS installed, I don't however and cant turn out the quality releases he does, but to answer your question it is not actually on the drawing board at this time, reaching a stable and complete build is the main goal in all respects.

Please all be aware to the fact we are at the moment a 2 man team and both in full time work, we will deliver when we can but I share your disappointment in the major amount of time it takes to get you new versions of ourmx, its not through lack of effort but to make the best for you folks takes a bit of time and a lot of skill, both are always in short supply, if you know of someone who is a guru in MFC c++ then feel free to point them in this direction as more hands makes a completion that much faster.

As Wonderer states we will deliver regardless of time span and the work will never stop until the ourmx client is able to stand on its own against the network attackers and have no major bugs, I think that's all there is to say at this time, I am still compiling the opennap data for the development folks and hope to reach an initial release of that soon to supplement the other data we hold to support client building.

This obviously robs time from the code work but is necessary for our future and perhaps that of the opennap community also who are locked into using clients even older than winmx , they too might like our materials to assist with development and so its worthwhile for them and us.

My thanks to all of those who keep the faith, we will get there and I hope with a contented heart.

untaimed18 · « **Reply #156 on:** August 12, 2014, 02:19:28 pm »

So any progress report on beta 2?

GhostShip · « **Reply #157 on:** August 12, 2014, 06:07:18 pm »

Hi Untaimed18

Not too much to report thats new, we have reworked a lot of the library and added missing code to many areas and we are working still on some primary issues that are not being helped by the cowardly attackers, its not easy to test stuff on the network when its full of junk traffic broadcast by someone with more time than brainpower , you know who you are

I'm working on recruiting a few more hands to ensure we can reach the commemorative date, its not guaranteed yet but theres still some time in the bag to tie up some of the loose ends and add further features missing in the last release, so nothing exciting to mention at this time but we have as I may have mentioned started an opennap equipped version that will arrive around the beta 3 mark, the next release aims to fix up bugs and issues in the first release and then we can move ahead on solid ground again, as you would expect further research into additional anti p2p tricks has been undertaken and we hope also to add those to the client in the future, the route is still clone then add new features and modify the protocol to eliminate attacks from criminals, once we have all that in hand I think the work can be called complete.

wonderer · « **Reply #158 on:** August 12, 2014, 11:40:50 pm »

It must be easy to create a very small restricted network

White Stripes · « **Reply #159 on:** August 13, 2014, 04:59:38 am »

Quote from: wonderer on August 12, 2014, 11:40:50 pm

It must be easy to create a very small restricted network

i thought of this too but apparently the devs are going with a 'build it on the battleground' approach... how better than to test armor but in live fire?