0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
First is dowloadspeed and I mentioned it before is depending on sources and bandwidth and tcp/ip being an over 50 year old protocol, it is still the best there is. This cannot be changed by different clients.Quality of files, If you take newsgroups, or any p2p, there are great differences in quality of content and as I don't think WinMx is meant to get CD quality music or HD-TV movies but for sharing and discussing samples there is no need to share 80Gb files. You will have to find resources giving good quality and will learn to shift the crap.
I never have been virus infected by files I downloaded from WinMx which I cannot say from many other filesharing groups I tried. This might be just because WinMx users are of a different specimen than lets say kaaza.Sharing albums or series is provided in WinMx if you share lists of filehashes.
To use WinMx you must be a bit inventive sometimes, but it can do everything if not more than any other p2p.
Maximum Users: 150,000Enabled Users: 139,061 [Details]Users active today: 34,324 (24.68%)Users active this week: 76,847 (55.26%)Users active this month: 113,520 (81.63%)Torrents: 1,007,590Releases: 434,169Artists: 366,750"Perfect" FLACs: 213,827Requests: 115,855 (66.96% filled)Snatches: 48,198,199Peers: 6,191,538Seeders: 6,074,706Leechers: 116,832Seeder/Leecher Ratio: 51.99
[Update] @Pri I think your failure to show any technical data proves what I have said, I hope the rest of you can now see the flaw in making such claims based on a few news headlines.
Surely not everyone knows it because I dont, you believe it to be based on a set of circumstances that are often not the same on WinMx your basically comparing apples with cucumbers and asking me to agree with your analysis
little is gained in trying to convert those who are happy with their lot and are not doing what everyone else is doing simply because everyone else makes up a bigger group, let us be and crusade for BT elsewhere where folks require less from their community.
From my point of view then Pri your implying I,m a liar yet your the one making the claims that you cant back up ??I think your starting to steer from simply informing folks to being a bit of a bully when folks dont agree with you, look at what I have said and what you have just said and then do some serious thinking as even the scenario you posted above is not correct, get yourself a paper and pencil to see why if you need to.Comparing pineapples to tomatoes does not work.
its pretty reckless to point folks to a model based on automatic infringement if the file is copyrighted, have we all forgotten that its uploading and not downloading that is cited in all cases as infringement and thus downloaders are 100% safer on such a non symmetrical network ?
Pri , please post the date and time of your conversation where its claimed I say we can filter files currently as I know we cant,, the fact that you are even making this claim says so much about your lack of real understanding about this network that it disappoints me, I can see you are unworthy of my time that would have been better spent explaining future plans and other things to those who care about what goes on here, you obviously don't and seem more than happy to put this whole site at risk with your reckless claims because you cant get your own way, if you wish to act in this manner don't be surprised when folks don't trust you anymore.I chose the word "Automatic infringement" on purpose btw to contrast the lack of such a mechanism in WinMX, why should I want to step back from telling the truth ?Also your lack of data to show any speed controls in a socket is noted, I dont agree I agreed with your claims and you can claim whatever you wish but folks can read this and other threads themselves to see exactly what I did or did not say, your interpretation is more than questionable.