0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
If i may ask a few questions to Nobby and Km or Ghostship but not Bughunter. Im not trying to be disrespctfull bug but i all ready know what you will say the pie maggots there i said it for ya.
Is it true that the server program that was or is being used by the pie team is one taken off of one of km's servers with out his knowing?
Am i wrong in thinking that if the pie team had been running enough servers that no matter if rock or km takeing a server off line for what ever reason the users of the pie patch would have been able to connect with no down time?
Do you really think Vladd is not makeing money off the scam P2P ad's on his site?
Being a WinMX help site do you not think it would be better not to have ad's at all if you have to have ad's for some thing that is scamming WinMX users? I know i dont mind ad's but i do mind scam P2p ad's on a help site where people come for help on Mx. We have all seen on forums that people have paid for mx when there is no need to at all. Dont you think haveing them on a winMX help site is confusing to some users?
Do you not think that the pie team has tried to mislead users on the DILL patch? Just becouse vladd and the pie team do not like KM not becouse of any thing wrong with the DILL?
I dont think ive never read here that the DILL is the only way to fix your mx as i have 100's of times on vladd's forum that Pie is the only way. What has been said is its the only patch that blocks fake files.
Many times on vladds forum ive read how bad the RIaa is and How he is takeing a stand against them, But he wants users to run his patch that has no way to block the fakes? With out his patch the fake files would be gone from searches. Thats just a fact. Is that really a stand against the RIAA?
Dont you think its in the best interest of the users on mx to stop the fake files?
Pie could stop useing the pie patch tomarrow get rid of the fake files. and if its ever needed again they could have a host file up in min.s its not like its going to change how to make a host file. Whats best for the users and growth of MX is being held up by ego and fear of loss of some kind of status by vladd and the pie team.
Some times to help you have to get out of the way. I dont think new users will stay around for another 10 months if this keeps up.
and as usuall you open your mouth and just shit comes out..............not once have you presented a single fact to support anything you say.........
Just to set the record straight, google do offer a filter system for their ads HOWEVER you dont get to block keywords, you have to block each specific site as it comes on and manually, this takes some time, first you must spot the ad, and dont forget they change frequently, and change page to page often, once spotted you might copy the URL log onto the google account then add that URL to the fliter. The process itself is simple, the results however are a little unpredictable especially with scam sites as the URLs change regularly. plus ofc even once in the filter it can take sometime to actually be filtered out:From my google account:Quote In 5 easy steps below, we will show you how to set up your competitive ad filter from within your AdSense account. * To edit your competitive ad filter, log in to your AdSense account at https://www.google.com/adsense. * Click the AdSense Setup tab. A row of links will appear beneath the tabs - click Competitive Ad Filter. This page will display the URLs that are currently being filtered for your account. If this is the first time that you use your filter, the text box will be empty. * Choose the appropriate product sub-tab and click Add/Edit Sites. * Copy the URL from the ad into your filter list. There are a couple of ways to find this URL; both methods are described in detail below. * Click Save Changes to add these sites to your competitive ad filter. It usually takes about 4 hours for your changes to take effect, so ads for these sites will continue to be displayed on your pages for a little while. If filtered ads are still appearing after 12 hours, please contact us.Just so as we are all clear, to totally prevent unwanted ads would require almost 24/7 monitoring, bit like fake flooders..
In 5 easy steps below, we will show you how to set up your competitive ad filter from within your AdSense account. * To edit your competitive ad filter, log in to your AdSense account at https://www.google.com/adsense. * Click the AdSense Setup tab. A row of links will appear beneath the tabs - click Competitive Ad Filter. This page will display the URLs that are currently being filtered for your account. If this is the first time that you use your filter, the text box will be empty. * Choose the appropriate product sub-tab and click Add/Edit Sites. * Copy the URL from the ad into your filter list. There are a couple of ways to find this URL; both methods are described in detail below. * Click Save Changes to add these sites to your competitive ad filter. It usually takes about 4 hours for your changes to take effect, so ads for these sites will continue to be displayed on your pages for a little while. If filtered ads are still appearing after 12 hours, please contact us.
and nobby if you think im lieing PRODUCE THE EVIDENCE.........but of course you cant.........
please show me any posting by a pie team member on this forum that has any basis on fact...........
http://www.slyck.com/news.php?story=1158QuoteWhile the effectiveness of lawsuits against American consumers has been long and thoroughly debated without definitive end, the RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) has announced a continued campaign regardless. It has been reported today that the RIAA has filed 235 more lawsuits against alleged copyright infringers. While no names have been released, the only details in the legal complaints is that 10 of them were filed against residents in North Carolina.The news comes just shortly after reports that the MPAA has shut down an NZB website.It has been reported that over 18,000 lawsuits have been filed with only a fraction of them resulting in settlements. Many lawsuits have also been dropped with only one known case of someone defending the suit. Many chose to settle as they are financially unable to pay the legal fees of a court battle against the RIAA. However, this also means that no legal precident is being set as well.Even though it has been reported that over 4,300 individuals were forced to settle, filesharing has exploded in population since the lawsuit campaign began. This has sparked arguments that the campaign is not only failing to stem the flow of filesharing, but has also encouraged it through free advertising.No further details of the latest wave of legal action have been released.This one speaks for itself, more "legal" action with no actual legal precident set, i guess its business as usual, exstortion at its most blatent!
While the effectiveness of lawsuits against American consumers has been long and thoroughly debated without definitive end, the RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) has announced a continued campaign regardless. It has been reported today that the RIAA has filed 235 more lawsuits against alleged copyright infringers. While no names have been released, the only details in the legal complaints is that 10 of them were filed against residents in North Carolina.The news comes just shortly after reports that the MPAA has shut down an NZB website.It has been reported that over 18,000 lawsuits have been filed with only a fraction of them resulting in settlements. Many lawsuits have also been dropped with only one known case of someone defending the suit. Many chose to settle as they are financially unable to pay the legal fees of a court battle against the RIAA. However, this also means that no legal precident is being set as well.Even though it has been reported that over 4,300 individuals were forced to settle, filesharing has exploded in population since the lawsuit campaign began. This has sparked arguments that the campaign is not only failing to stem the flow of filesharing, but has also encouraged it through free advertising.No further details of the latest wave of legal action have been released.
this thread isn't a pie advert, locked and moved to cesspoolsorry my mistake, i thought this was a different forumknobby: no corrections to the sequence of events in my post? i may have got the date/time of one or two things slightly out as to find out when pie admitted various things i did have to confirm with posts on a pie forum, which is damn hard to do with 90% of them have been deleted and 5% moved
19:10:19 <Sabre'> TSC, ranma and myself saved winmx
sorry but what does your google account and obvious creative editing have to do with anything.............im still waiting for a single fact to back all the accusations you have posted on this forum..............just more lie deny and decieve..............ponders if nobass actually knows what a fact is.///even km cant see a single fact in your lies..........so much so he thought he was on the pie forum...............nobass when you accuse someone of TAKING down 3 cache servers........which by the way arenot under km,s control.........of having trojans or virues in his patch........of flooding the network with fake files........as you have been a party too..........as you have not made one posting correcting these mistakes ( cough bullshit lies cough).........you are supposed to present the killer blow THE EVIDENCE.........ya know that funni stuff that adds weight to your argument.............well............. are you going to present any evidence?????????????????????????????/have you even bothered to answer neutrons question..................its a pretty simple question but of course answering that would expose another errrrrrrr um mistake on pies part as to why spybot and microsofts malicious software removal tool fire up when running pie installers ..............do you deny nobby decieveing users into downloading pie patch without advising them of the problem of riaa........but of course since you ADVISE blocking you were protected...........yet you denied users this information..........did you ever raise with vladd or gemini the problem of creditablity if they ran pay for winmx adds on there respective web sites..........have you forgotten making numerous postings stating that blocking was illegal........this of course is a blantant mistake..........you nobby obviously find no issue in the wholesale deleting editing and moving of posts on your forum.........even posts made my totally independant posters such as robinhood...........yet again denying and decieveing users...........but getting back to your pathetic attempt at evidence,this may come as a surprise to you but us law doesnt apply outside of the us....it is pointless to quote stories from the us as they have zero bearing here.......( this is the internet dipstick us law doesnt apply ).riaa mpaa can kiss my ass there powerless and you know it.........im sorry quicks but if you intend to let idiots like nobby post i see it as my god given right of free speech to rip him a new asshole and shove his stupid head up it...........winmx first..............
Vladd and pie were the first to talk about monopolising MX. I remember the copy of the MSN conversation they made public where vladd said something like "we need to get rid of the DLL and promote our patch"those are not the exact quotes from him, but that's basically what he meant. He was talking also about getting the pie patch to slyck's website and denying the dll.KM and winmxworld have always been honest.. now they are whining and complaining that KM is the bad guy trying to monopolise MX.. lol..the only weapon they have is the pie lie machine... and it's not working well anymore.
