0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Nobby If you wish to post insults at least add something to the discussion or do you have another agenda ?Ice has put his case perhaps over strongly but he is thinking of the network in his posts, perhaps you could follow his lead ?
I am glad to see that people are posting replies relating to the topic and not to other things. I am also glad to see that KM as improved the patch so it blocks Fake flooders, this will help in many ways one being that if a user used the dll patch they will not see fake files and another being that the Cache Server will not be under as much traffic pressure not that KM would worry about that.
Well try it this way, the DLL blocks flooders & flooded results 100% the vast majority of the time & a few escape during the detection process ONLYSomething that can't be claimed for PG & the -user search filter, PG leaves LONG windows for flooders to connect & -user leaves MANY fakes unblocked. PG also BY DEFAULT blocks many legitimate ip addresses needlessly, & while these things are PARTIALLY effective at protecting the network they are a GREAT DEAL LESS EFFECTIVE, & in my opinion should be avoided as a solution & used as a last resort only.the DLL does NOT "trash" the hosts file, it does however remove entries referring to cache servers legitimately at runtime as these would interfere with it's operation, as i pointed out in a previous post, subsequently uninstalling leaves your winmx unpatched, in the same way as installing msn7 over msn 5 & then uninstalling msn leaves you without msn, not with msn5.. this is perfectly normal & expected behaviour, the patch being in my opinion an UPGRADE to your patching system.
It is still not clear the actual significance of blocklist updating daily or more frequently. I agree, more frequently would seem to be better, but quantitatively, how much? Until that information is known, flying flags about the claimed significance of the difference is unconvincing.
quote from nobby.........If he really had the best interests of WPN at heart, he would stop with the lies and false claims, that tend to draw embarrassing factual refutes. Giving tacit approval to his claims and tactics, making no attempt to correct his lies.......show me one just one lie..........nothing i have ever posted regarding pie has been incorrect,,,,,,,,,as no pie maggot has ever shown or demonstrated anything that i or any winmxworld person has ever posted.....was wrong..........fact pies hosts file is a disaster........no argumentfact vladd has nothing but his own personnal financial interests at heart.......fact pie have contributed nothing to winmx since the crash...........fact pie have deliberatly lied denied and decieved every pie user..........fact you nobby have been at the forefront of this lie deny policy...........fact only winmxworld has dealt with the fakes the flooding and the dos attacks by riaafact only winmxworld has brought the disastrous details of pie to the attention of the communityfact even now despite the over whelming evidence that pie is a absolute piece of shit you still go on promoting it and worse still dont tell users about blocking shame on youfact pie hasnt done one thing to address the problem of riaa mpaa etcfact by your continuall postings trying to make the case for a pie hosts file you are still lieing denying and decievingfact you like gnarly just show your complete ignorance of networking and computing in generall by postingfact you nobby are the village idiot, ok gnarly is giving you a run for your money but you still hold the crown ......for nowfact pie vladd and yourselfs are now finished .thou you have contributed nothing to winmx at least users are now aware of pies bullshitwanna refute any of those facts nobby..........be interesting to see what crap you come up with...........winmx firstpersonnal agenders last
Ask and you shall receive! I have your pumpkin in a can right here:
I call upon Sabre who hosts the update bar used in the pie patch to inform users of the new patch and I call upon the vladd44 teams to be honest in giving out advice regarding patches, let the user have a choice, they have brains and no one has any right to mislead them.For the record Sabre was asked about using the update bar recently but said he is not a memeber of pie and as Nobby showed is not someone the community has any faith in or he in the community, but the fact of the matter is the pie patch should be under pies control not Sabres, Sabre is free to launch his own patch if he wishes to be honest and open with the users.
