0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
but thats exactly what your doing quicks rideing rough shot over everybody and there views, take your replys to merlins very genuine concerns as a prime example............just suddenly you seem blind to what is the obvious.........and what is it im saying is untrue ? or does the truth hurt so much you refuse to see or accept it........and your veiled threat to ban me smacks of censorship.........if you cant answer the tough questions then just say so..........you have brought this on your self quicks.......no one else to blame or point the finger at............quote from quicksIce , this is your last warning, as a long time supporter of this site...........yes thats right a long term supporter of this site over 2 years and thousands of hours put in fixing broken pie installs and the many other issues users of this community have found them selves in............and yet the very thing winmxworld was founded on is now no longer revelant........the community...............self appointed committees..........doing back room deals with those that haver stated publically and more then once that if they cant control winmx they will destroy it, a scheme that places the very existance of winmx in jepordy............and not to mention the current philosphey of winmxworld is a complete reversal of what it was only a month ago..........you have tried doing deals with pie in the past with the last effort them useing the blocklist which backfired with gem releasing a long winded bag of lies as to why no one should be useing the winmxworld blocklist..............and now suddenly you find these very same people so trustworthy your prepared to risk everything................if you want to ban me go right ahead............the very fact that you are now beyond reasoning with, makes this all pointless as your going to proceed regardless..............but when all this stupidity comes back to bite you on the ass, as it will, anything associated with pie is doomed to failure anyways, least the community will know were to look when winmx is closed permanantly..............just hope you have a large capacity on your email account to handle all the thank you notes...........
Feel free to show where you gave me any documents KM I would be interested to see them as I havent yet.You really are sinking low in your efforts to take down this site as it proved your last 2 false claims groundless, winmx has lasted more than the week you claimed it would collapse in and as the patch you started this thread with doesnt use the tcp primary as you currently are to abuse the users trust your wrong in that sphere too, in short go elsewhere if your not helping winmx, most folks have had enough drama queens.I make apologies to new readers for the sour grapes of KM, he is a mx coding power house for sure but his view that no one else can code but him is hardly the truth.I have 1 coder currently on the patch as the majority has already been written, he would be amused you think your the only programmer on the whole network.I,ll deliver a full and concise reply to your post Hell as you have taken the time to ask for details its only correct I supply them to you, this will be in apporoximately 2 to 3 hours , thanks for your patience.
..... I would however like anyone else wanting info to be able to do that here.. if its possible or needed
I have half a mind to send this non-existent information on this method of shutting down the network that you know better than the experts doesn't actually exist....
I can give many more examples of either posts by km or tech info to demonstrate the reason why there is no danger in the design of the patch as it stands and I,m sure any coders here will agree that if somethings not in the patch the chances of it being exploited are next to nothing in reality.
If it helps anyone I can put together some pictures of the patch architecture that show roughly what it does and how it does it, then a least we can all focus on anything of theoretical concern and address it.
KMs patch works in a way that would mean there is a potential hazzard for open sourcing it.
2. Vladd, from the very word go, said he would support the best "open source" patch, unfortunately KM chose to hide what was in his patch, and WmW supported this, odd now that they can create the same sort of patch open source. This does add weight to the theory KM had some hidden goodies in his.
the new community patch will be able to support a network of up to 300 independantly run community caches,
Quote from: Me Here..... I would however like anyone else wanting info to be able to do that here.. if its possible or needed [qoute="ñòóKýçrÕôK"]I am locking this topic thus preventing what was previously asaked.... however, i'd like someone please to put on their ANALITICAL head, please ignore the emotive choice of language & read carefully..Quote from: KMI have half a mind to send this non-existent information on this method of shutting down the network that you know better than the experts doesn't actually exist....he then goes on to talk about blocking and filtering (mixed into the rest).. i don't know if anyone else's reading of this pointed to the same conclusion, but as i read it, it would seem that exposing the BLOCKING/FILTERING code, exposes a possible means of shutdown, i may be misreading what he said, but it's how it reads to me..i may be wrong & a new patch *may* do it differently & not expose this danger (if it's there) by doing things in a different way...*but* you don't have KM's blocking/filtering code to know how he did it... (neither do i)engineers (software, mechanical electrical, electronic, etc.) when faced with similar problems tend to find similar solutions (ask any patents office)just some thoughts...... & now we have a whole new thread we didn't need because of (in my opinion) over-zealous use of the moderation controls (i won't say censorship)
I've been wanting to say this since all this happened when KM took his servers down. I made the statement to Me Here when it all started that I thought this was all going to be exciting. Man what an understatement. I was astounded at the talent and knowledge of all of you all. I had no idea that you were all as talented as you are. I knew you had good working knowledge and all but DAMN!! I had absolutely no idea all of you were so capable. First of all thank you so much for letting me be a part of that. When WinMXWorld split from the PIE group and went with the dll I always thought "I bet that was cool". I had no idea of everything it took to actually DO that. KM you're an amazing young man. Your dll has provided a future for WinMX in a way most would have never thought possable. Thank you for letting the guys alter it. It was a good thing to do. Being on this side of the fence this time I have to say WHAT A RUSH! You guys are great and I'm just saying thank you one more time. Thank you for everything. And just in case he reads this or even if he can, Tiny, I miss ya bud. Come on back.
Ghost Dunce
calling me a liar?I have half a mind to send this non-existent information on this method of shutting down the network that you know better than the experts doesn't actually exist directly to macrovision along with an instruction manual - just so you can have a chance just to prove to everyone that sitting there using a program i made for you that gives you the exact numbers to put in to a text file so all you do is copy makes you so much more of an expert with so much more knowledge than the person who made the program in the first place - if you're such fucking experts why can't you do *anything* even slightly more advanced than edit text? and why do you need fucking instructions to do even that? (btw the combined knowledge of these "experts" running winmxworld is that you make web pages by opening a random microsoft office application, such as power point, and using the save as HTML option - yes power point for a web page...)